• Natural Gas News

    ONE YEAR TO ZERO HOUR:in search of a compromise on Ukrainian gas transit [GGP]

Summary

The  current  contract  between  PJSC  Gazprom  and  NJSC  Naftogaz  of  Ukraine is due to end in...

by: Tatiana Mitrova and and Alexander Sobko, SKOLKOVO Energy Centre

Posted in:

Global Gas Perspectives

ONE YEAR TO ZERO HOUR:in search of a compromise on Ukrainian gas transit [GGP]

The  current  contract  between  PJSC  Gazprom  and  NJSC  Naftogaz  of  Ukraine is due to end in exactly one year.  Gazprom will not have had enough  time  to  complete  the  construction  of  all  diversification  gas  pipelines by that point: by 2020, only one string of the Turkish Stream is guaranteed to be launched (operating for the Turkish market). Nord Stream  2  will  probably  be  commissioned  some  time  later,  while  the  construction of the second line of the Turkish Stream can be expected in two-three years’ time. 

All  this  makes  it  necessary  to  sign  a  new  transit  agreement  with  Ukraine.  At  the  same  time,  considering  the  plans  to  gradually  bring  online new gas transmission capacities, Gazprom is interested in new short- or medium-term arrangements.  In turn, Naftogaz of Ukraine is vested in a new long-term contract to ensure that its gas transmission system is sufficiently loaded. 

The objective of the new transit agreement is complex: it is not limited to a mathematical comparison of necessary export volumes and avail-able  gas  pipeline  capacities.  Russia  also  needs  to  consider  whether  it  will  be  able  to  «reach»  all  the  countries  buying  Russian  gas  with  its  new  gas  pipeline  systems.    There  is  also  the  factor  of  irregularity  of  supplies, which means that the capacity of gas pipelines has to exceed transit volumes.  The possibility of using underground gas storage fa-cilities - both in Europe and in Ukraine - will also affect the ultimate setup of market operations.  It is necessary to understand whether re-verse gas supplies to Ukraine will continue, or whether Gazprom and Naftogaz of Ukraine will again switch to deliveries under a direct con-tract. It is important to note that reverse supplies increase both Europe-an exports of Gazprom and gas transit volumes through Ukraine.

One  of  the  remaining  factors  of  uncertainty  is  whether  European  companies  will  take  part  in  the  management  of  the  Ukrainian  GTS.    There is also the possibility of delivering some of the gas intended for European consumers to Ukraine’s eastern borders.

Gas  transit  tariff  will  certainly  be  a  key  factor  in  the  negotiations.    There is no doubt that in the new agreement the tariff will directly or indirectly depend on the obligations in relation to gas volumes pumped, which Gazprom will take on.

The  interrelationship  of  all  these  factors  analyzed  in  this  paper  will  determine  the  final  agreements,  configuration  and,  most  importantly,  the cost of Russian gas transits through Ukraine after 2019.  The three parties in the negotiation process indeed face a complex task: to agree all these complex parameters of the new agreement within the coming year.    In  the  worst  case  scenario,  there  could  be  a  repetition  of  the  2008/2009 winter events.  The agreements would be signed at the last moment  (although  probably  without  a  dramatic  interruption  of  gas  supplies to Europe).  We very much hope that this development can be avoided.

DOWNLOAD the full report, ONE YEAR TO ZERO HOUR: in search of a compromise on Ukrainian gas transit by Tatiana Mitrova and Alexander Sobko, SKOLKOVO Energy Centre, Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO.  Tatiana Mitrova is a Member of the Natural Gas World Advisory Board

The statements, opinions and data contained in the content published in Global Gas Perspectives are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s) of Natural Gas World.